Sri Sri has been trying to take all the stakeholders in the Ayodhya dispute on board for an out of court settlement. Recently the apex court said that it will hear the case only as a title suit not a matt of faith.
Recently when religious heavyweights from both communities Hindu and Muslims Shri Shri Ravi Shankar and Salman Nadvi called for resolving the issue out of court, they faced huge backlash for suggesting so.
The intervention plea of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, at whose instance the cases were fast-tracked by the apex court, was also rejected.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday dashed the hopes of activists like Shyam Benegal and Teesta Setalvad to intervene in the sensitive Babri Masjid-Ram Temple land dispute case, making it clear that only the parties to the original lawsuits would be allowed to put forth their arguments.
A three-judge bench headed by chief justice Dipak Misra said that on the next date of hearing-23 March-it would consider whether the law laid down in a 1994 judgment needed to be revisited by a Constitution bench.
The Supreme Court heard a batch of petitions against the Allahabad High Court verdict in the Ayodhya dispute.
A three-judge bench of the Allahabad HC, in a 2:1 majority ruling, had in 2010 ordered that the land be partitioned equally among three parties - the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.
Ram Janambhoomi- Babri Masjid dispute is century old point of tussle between Hindus and Muslims.
On December 6, 1992, thousands of karsevaks had razed the Babri mosque in Ayodhya and over 2,000 people were reported to have been killed in the riots which followed the demolition.